Application to Realize Gains

1. Under what alias should the Ministry address this application?

Use an alias only. Do not provide your legal name, wallet address, or account details.

2. In what capacity are you submitting this request?

□ Individual holder　□ Household representative　□ Self-appointed community delegate　□ Capacity not yet determined

3. How long have you maintained the position concerned?

□ Less than one week　□ One week to three months　□ Three months to one year　□ More than one year　□ Unknown

4. What percentage of your position do you propose to sell?

An estimate is sufficient. Actual balances are not required.

5. How was this position originally acquired?

□ Independent decision　□ Community recommendation　□ A persuasive image　□ Circumstances remain unclear

6. Have you previously applied for permission to realize gains?

□ No　□ Yes, still pending　□ Yes, outcome unknown　□ Not applicable

7. Describe the position in non-identifying terms.

For example: a modest position acquired during a period of considerable optimism.

8. How would you prefer to be notified of further consideration?

□ On this application status page　□ By checking this application status page again　□ At the next personal review of this application status page

9. Does anyone else consider themselves interested in your position?

□ No known interested parties　□ Members of my household　□ Other holders　□ The community in general　□ Unknown

10. I confirm that this application contains aliases and estimates, not identifying account information.

11. Select the principal purpose of the proposed sale.

□ Living expenses　□ Reducing exposure　□ A planned purchase　□ Realizing a gain　□ Other personal circumstances

12. Briefly explain the circumstances giving rise to your request.

13. When would access to the proceeds be useful?

□ Immediately　□ Within one month　□ Within one year　□ Whenever administratively convenient

14. What first brought the possibility of selling to your attention?

□ A financial obligation　□ A change in my circumstances　□ The displayed value of my position　□ The existence of a sell button

15. Which proposed uses of the proceeds apply?

□ Essential expenses　□ Savings　□ Debt reduction　□ Discretionary purchase　□ Undecided

16. Would a smaller sale meet your stated purpose?

□ Yes　□ No　□ Possibly　□ Unknown

17. What practical outcome do you expect this transaction to achieve?

18. How much flexibility does your proposed timing permit?

□ None　□ Several days　□ Several months　□ An administratively significant interval

19. Who would directly benefit from the proposed proceeds?

□ The applicant　□ The applicant’s household　□ Another person　□ The answer requires explanation

20. Why do you believe you require access to your own funds?

21. Is the community aware that you have personal financial circumstances?

□ Yes　□ No　□ I assumed this was understood　□ Unknown

22. Estimate the number of holders who may notice your transaction.

23. Rate the anticipated effect on community morale.

1: barely observable. 10: requires a special announcement.

24. Where might concern about your transaction be expressed?

□ Community chat　□ Public timeline　□ Private messages　□ An unnecessarily long voice recording　□ Unknown

25. Provide a reassuring sentence that contains no promise you cannot keep.

26. Have you identified a benefit to the community that offsets your personal benefit?

□ Yes　□ Still considering　□ I believed the two could coexist　□ No

27. Could other holders interpret your sale as evidence that selling is possible?

□ Yes　□ No　□ Only if they observe it　□ Unknown

28. Explain how you would prevent your independent decision from becoming a precedent.

29. Where should the Ministry stop assessing the consequences of this transaction?

□ Direct effects　□ Reasonably foreseeable effects　□ All effects anyone can imagine　□ I defer to the Ministry

30. I understand that an absence of measurable harm does not conclude the Community Impact Assessment.

31. When did you last consult the prevailing holder sentiment?

□ Today　□ This week　□ Before my circumstances changed　□ I have not consulted it

32. List any holders who may experience emotional distress as a result of your proposed transaction.

Use invented aliases or write Unknown. Do not identify real people.

33. Which tone best describes your current intention?

□ Respectfully necessary　□ Regrettably independent　□ Provisionally apologetic　□ Insufficiently classified

34. How prepared are you to apologize for an otherwise ordinary transaction?

35. How should silence from other holders be interpreted?

□ No objection　□ Consent pending confirmation　□ Potential disappointment　□ Unknown

36. Could you retain a small position for the emotional convenience of others?

□ Yes　□ No　□ I already proposed a partial sale　□ Not applicable

37. Why are you selling?

The Office of Community Continuity requires its own statement of purpose.

38. What evidence of continued goodwill could accompany your sale?

□ A courteous message　□ Continued participation　□ A carefully selected reaction image　□ Goodwill should not require evidence

39. For how many days should the Ministry monitor disappointment following your proposed sale?

40. Complete this assurance: My decision concerns my circumstances, although the community may…

41. Estimate the number of retirement plans potentially endangered by this transaction.

42. Were you informed that other holders had incorporated your continued participation into their retirement plans?

□ Yes　□ No　□ Only after mentioning a sale　□ Unknown

43. Which retirement assumptions have been presented to you?

□ All holders will remain indefinitely　□ The chart will eventually resolve everything　□ Early retirement is a shared entitlement　□ None have been presented　□ Unknown

44. How many additional years of work might a concerned holder attribute to your decision?

45. Whose retirement should be considered first?

□ Each person’s own　□ The longest-standing holder’s　□ The most vocal holder’s　□ The Bureau should establish an order

46. Assess your willingness to postpone your plans in support of an unspecified pension.

47. Has any affected pension been documented beyond a message beginning “bro”?

□ Yes　□ No　□ Documentation is expected　□ Unknown

48. Propose a compassionate response to a retirement plan that was created without consulting you.

49. Can you guarantee that nobody will blame your sale for a future postponement?

□ Yes　□ No　□ No person can reasonably guarantee this　□ Guarantee pending review

50. I acknowledge receipt of concerns regarding pensions whose existence the Bureau has not independently established.

51. Have you considered simply not selling?

□ Yes　□ I am considering it now　□ Repeatedly　□ I would like my original request considered

52. Could your financial circumstances instead be resolved through additional employment?

□ Yes　□ No　□ I am already employed　□ Employment is not the issue

53. Which alternatives have you examined?

□ Waiting　□ Budget adjustments　□ Selling something else　□ Explaining the circumstances again　□ None are applicable

54. Would reducing your expectations be preferable to reducing your position?

□ Yes　□ No　□ My expectations are already modest　□ I request clarification of preferable

55. How many additional days of waiting have you assessed without discovering new information?

56. Have you considered waiting until every other participant has achieved financial security?

□ Yes　□ No　□ I cannot establish when that would occur　□ I believed this condition was outside my control

57. Explain why postponement does not itself resolve the circumstances described in Section II.

58. Would a committee examining your alternatives constitute an additional alternative?

□ Yes　□ No　□ Only temporarily　□ This appears to be the current process

59. Rate your remaining reserve of administratively useful patience.

60. I have considered the possibility that my circumstances could improve without access to the requested proceeds.

61. Please reconsider your response to Question 37.

Provide a separate reconsideration. Your original statement will remain on file.

62. What advance notice would you consider courteous?

□ None is necessary　□ A brief notice　□ A full statement　□ A consultation followed by a consultation about timing

63. Which term should appear in Ministry correspondence?

□ Sale　□ Position adjustment　□ Temporary reduction in visible commitment　□ Proposed departure from collective expectations

64. Who should receive a courtesy acknowledgement?

□ People directly affected　□ Community moderators　□ Anyone who might later claim to be affected　□ No acknowledgement is applicable

65. Draft a courteous notification without asking recipients to manage your finances.

66. Do you understand the Ministry’s distinction between notifying and requesting permission?

□ Yes　□ I understand the distinction but question its application　□ Further explanation would be useful　□ Understanding pending

67. Would you refrain from appearing pleased with the proceeds?

□ Yes　□ No　□ I do not intend to publish my reaction　□ Not applicable

68. Rate the procedural courtesy demonstrated by completing this application.

69. If you disagree with the Ministry, how would you prefer the disagreement recorded?

□ Respectful objection　□ Request for reconsideration　□ Temporary alignment difficulty　□ Disagreement should retain its ordinary meaning

70. I understand that courteous wording does not reduce the number of required sections.

71. Is this sale absolutely necessary, or do you merely want the money?

□ Necessary　□ Useful rather than urgent　□ I want the money　□ The distinction does not determine ownership

72. Have your obligations agreed to wait for collective approval?

□ Yes　□ No　□ Obligations do not enter agreements　□ Not applicable

73. On a scale from 1–10, how selfish would you characterize this request?

You may select Not applicable if the premise does not describe your decision.

74. What would have to change for access to your own funds to become unnecessary?

75. Who is qualified to confirm your stated need?

□ The applicant　□ Someone familiar with the circumstances　□ A relevant professional　□ A holder with strong opinions

76. How should the Ministry classify the existence of expenses outside the project?

□ Ordinary circumstance　□ Foreseeable administrative complication　□ Competing narrative　□ Outside Ministry jurisdiction

77. Has explaining your circumstances repeatedly changed those circumstances?

□ Yes　□ No　□ Only the time available to address them　□ Unknown

78. In 500–1,000 words, explain why your personal desire to realize gains should take precedence over collective expectations.

The requested length is guidance. A considered shorter statement is accepted. Do not include identifying or account information.

79. Having provided that explanation, do you consider your need sufficiently explained?

□ Yes　□ No　□ It was sufficiently explained in Section II　□ I await the Ministry’s interpretation

80. I confirm that the circumstances described above continue to exist despite their classification.

81. Have you consulted the community before reaching this decision?

□ Yes　□ No　□ I consulted it after reaching the decision　□ Consultation is ongoing

82. How many distinct opinions have you collected?

83. What was the prevailing response?

□ Understanding　□ Objection　□ Mixed responses　□ A request to consult additional people　□ Not applicable

84. Having now completed 83 questions, do you still believe selling is necessary?

□ Yes　□ No　□ More necessary than before　□ My circumstances remain my own

85. How did you determine that enough people had been consulted?

□ A reasonable sample　□ Everyone directly affected　□ The conversation became repetitive　□ No stopping condition was provided

86. Summarize the strongest objection without identifying its author.

87. Does resolving an objection require the objector to agree?

□ Yes　□ No　□ Agreement would be preferable　□ The objection concerns a decision belonging to me

88. Would consulting people who have not heard of the project improve the legitimacy of the process?

□ Yes　□ No　□ Only by increasing its length　□ Further consideration requested

89. Identify one useful fact obtained through consultation, or state that no new fact emerged.

90. I confirm that consultation has been described accurately, including any consultation that did not occur.

91. On what basis should the Committee read your final statement?

□ Personal autonomy　□ Practical necessity　□ Reasonable discretion　□ All applicable grounds

92. Identify any remaining difference between your understanding of ownership and the Ministry’s preferred interpretation.

93. Does collective consideration necessarily require collective control?

□ Yes　□ No　□ Only by prior agreement　□ The distinction deserves a separate circular

94. Describe what WE NOT ME means to you and explain how your proposed transaction is consistent with this principle.

A considered response is required. There is no minimum word count.

95. Explain how your responses can be read consistently even where different departments asked substantially the same question.

96. Is there anything further the Committee needs to understand your request?

□ No　□ My answers contain the relevant information　□ The ordinary meaning of ownership　□ I would prefer to stop writing now

97. I confirm that these responses represent my intended application and that any estimates are identified as such.

98. I acknowledge that ownership does not necessarily imply discretion.

99. I understand that successful submission confirms receipt of my application and does not grant authorization to sell.

100. I request that the Ministry begin considering whether consideration of my request may begin.